FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Referendum

  • Our School Board unanimously approved a resolution to hold a special election on Tuesday, November 4, 2025 to address our District's long-term facilities needs. This is a capital referendum that would allow our District to issue debt for significant districtwide facilities improvements. The ballot will include two questions seeking voter approval for a school building bond.

    If approved, these investments will support the construction and equipping of additional classroom spaces to increase capacity; safety and security enhancements; deferred maintenance projects; renovations and updates to learning environments; and improvements to athletic and activity facilities.

  • Since 2019 Cambridge-Isanti Schools’ Administration and School Board have taken thoughtful and intentional steps to restore the District’s financial health and develop a comprehensive, long-term plan to protect our community’s assets. The last five years of planning, development and community engagement have included:

    • Strengthening the District’s financial health through a combination of expense reductions and the 2021 operating referendum.

    • Developing a community-based Strategic Plan to align resources and priorities that are focused on the future.

    • Completing a districtwide comprehensive facility study to identify and prioritize our District’s facility challenges.

    • Surveying community members to gather feedback and prioritize potential solutions.

    • Assembling a 50+ person community task force to review facility study data and community survey data, and make a recommendation to the School Board about next steps. 

    All of this careful and collaborative work helped inform the School Board’s final decision to pursue a bond referendum on November 4, 2025. For more details on the facilities planning timeline, click here

  • QUESTION ONE (1) would provide funding to improve safety and security, repair aging building infrastructure, and modernize learning spaces in each of our buildings. The priorities include:

    Modernizing & Updating Learning Environments  

    • Classroom additions for WL, SPED, and ELL, new labs for culinary arts, robotics, certified nurse assistant, and CNC/machine coding. (CIHS)

    • Reconfigure student services, counseling, and health office spaces and relocate the career center for increased access/use. (CIHS)

    • Remodel learning commons to create more small group rooms, maker spaces, STEM space, and/or speech areas. (CIHS, CIS, CPS, IPS)

    • Update performing arts with new curtains, dressing room, and lighting, as well PA and mic upgrades. (CIHS)

    • Add sinks, power drops, and casework to IIS STEM lab for improved safety, flexibility, and organization. 

    • Build a new addition at IPS for cafeteria, kitchen/receiving, adventure center, small group rooms and main entrance/office. 

    • Add new entry at IPS with expanded parent drop-off and reconfigure early childhood parking. 

    • Reconfigure existing spaces to create additional space for special education, and early childhood needs. (CIS, IPS)

    • Create small group and breakout spaces. 

    • Repurpose underutilized spaces to create special education rooms, offices, and storage. (CPS, IPS)

    • Update furniture for more collaborative learning districtwide.

    Enhancing Safety and Security

    • Enhance entrance security for early childhood at CIS and IPS

    • Replace outdated fire alarms, door access, and security camera systems.

    • Improve ADA accessibility at multiple sites (ADA paths, ramps, parking, hardscapes).

    • Add a secure public entrance for IMS auditorium/recreational spaces that is separate from the school entrance.

    Addressing Deferred Maintenance 

    • Repair exteriors including masonry and structural needs, exterior metal panels and trim, as well as sections of windows and doors.

    • Replace aging plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems (ex; supply fans from 1967, welding shop ventilation/exhaust system from 2002).

    • Renew interior flooring, ceilings, casework, doors, walls, lockers, and bleachers.

    Improving Recreation, Athletic and Activity Spaces 

    • Add tennis courts and lighting, as well as updates to baseball field (lights, fencing, bleachers, and storage), turf stadium, and varsity softball field (lighting, sound, & ADA pathway) at CIHS.

      VIEW CONCEPT PLANS HERE

    QUESTION TWO (2) would provide funding to improve and expand spaces for physical education, community recreation, athletics, and extracurricular activities. Priorities include:

    • Build a new fieldhouse at the high school that would include four multi-purpose courts (physical education, basketball, volleyball, pickleball, etc) a competition track and gymnastics space on the lower level, as well as a walking/running track and fitness room on the upper-level for community use. 

    • Provide physical education and athletic storage areas, school store, community entry and gathering space, as well as additional parking.

      VIEW CONCEPT PLANS HERE

  • Minnesota’s School Building Bond Agricultural Credit (AG2School Credit) provides landowners tax relief on school bonds by providing a 70% reduction for their agricultural property. It was created to help reduce and equalize taxes for agricultural landowners in districts where, historically, it was difficult to pass bonds because of how agricultural landowners were taxed. 

    Since the bill was passed, rural districts have been able to pass bonds that improve the quality of Greater Minnesota Education.

  • This comprehensive plan would enhance the safety, security, and accessibility of our buildings. It would also improve learning environments for our students, as well as sports, recreational, and activity spaces for our community – providing improved learning spaces at all of our schools so we can continue to educate, empower, and inspire every student every day.

    • Operational Levies are for Learning. An operating levy (sometimes also referred to as an operating referendum) is an election where voters decide whether to provide funds that help the District run and operate its schools. These funds go into a general fund and support day-to-day learning, educational programs, and student needs. They cannot be used for construction or building maintenance purposes. 

    • Bond Referendums are for Buildings. A bond referendum is an election where voters decide whether to provide funds for new construction projects, updates to existing facilities, or additions to school properties. These funds can only be used for buildings, not for daily operations or programs.

      While we have made improvements, the needs are now bigger than what our budget can cover. A bond referendum is needed to address the rising costs and major building upgrades needed to protect our community’s assets.

  • A smaller portion of the district’s existing debt is scheduled to mature in 2028, followed by the retirement of a larger portion in 2031. The proposed referendum is designed to strategically leverage this expiring debt to minimize the tax impact on the community.

  • In 2019 Cambridge-Isanti Schools faced financial challenges – being a year away from statutory operating debt and having less than a 5% fund balance – and implemented $7.5 million in budget cuts over two years. Recognizing the need for additional funding, the district also sought an operating referendum which, after two attempts, was approved by the community and helped the district become financially healthy.

    While we have been addressing HVAC, parking, and energy efficiency improvements without impacting property taxes, the school district recognized the need for a strategic plan to align resources and focus district priorities for the future. A community task force was created in 2022 and, after six months of collaborative community-based planning, developed strategic priorities which the school board approved in December 2022.

    One of the four strategic priorities included creating and maintaining an innovative, comprehensive master plan in order to intentionally plan for our future facilities and programming needs. To achieve this, we have spent the last two years working with a K-12 Facilities Planning Consultant to develop a comprehensive facility plan for our district. 

    Currently, we are reviewing the needs of aging facilities, community growth, programming needs, and its financial picture as we consider next steps. To ensure we are prioritizing the right projects for our district and our community, a facility planning task force has been assembled to evaluate all the district’s facility needs and provide input on solutions.

  • No—none of the funds from the 2021 operating levy were used for building improvements. Operating levies are strictly limited by law and can only be used for day-to-day school operations. In our case, the 2021 Levy for Learning was specifically approved by voters to help hire and retain quality teachers and expand career and vocational education opportunities for students.

    Thanks to that support, we’ve strengthened our instructional programs and improved our financial stability. However, those dollars cannot be used for facility repairs, upgrades, or construction.

    At the same time, many of our school buildings are aging—some approaching 100 years old—and require significant updates to remain safe, efficient, and functional for today’s learning needs. While we’ve made strategic improvements using limited maintenance funds and innovative solutions, the scope of deferred maintenance and the need for modern learning spaces has outpaced what our operating budget can cover.

    That’s why a bond referendum is needed now. It’s the only funding mechanism available to Minnesota school districts to address major facility needs. By investing in our schools through this plan, we can preserve our shared assets, protect learning time, and ensure our students and community have access to safe, secure, and future-ready spaces for decades to come.

  • The bond will provide $36.5 million for school construction projects, creating 200–250 jobs and generating more than $58 million in local economic activity. New and improved facilities will also attract state tournaments, competitions, performances, and events—bringing over 8,700 visitors each year and adding more than $6.5 million in local spending that stays in our community over the next ten years.

    Strong schools also draw new families and businesses, expanding the tax base without raising rates for current residents. Research shows that every $1 spent on schools can raise home values by $20, benefiting all property owners.

    The bond also invests in career-ready programs like woods, welding, culinary arts, and nursing—preparing our students and graduates for local jobs, supporting our workforce, and strengthening partnerships with local employers.

  • Yes. The district works with specialized legal counsel to ensure every aspect of the referendum process complies with state and federal laws. Our bond counsel, Kutak Rock LLP, is a nationally recognized law firm with deep expertise in public finance. They provide legal guidance on ballot language, bond issuance, and all required legal filings, ensuring our process is accurate, transparent, and legally sound.

    Kutak Rock has represented school districts, cities, counties, and other public entities across the country. We are especially proud that one of our representatives on the Kutak Rock team is a Cambridge-Isanti Bluejacket graduate, bringing both professional expertise and a personal connection to our community. Their role is to protect the district—and ultimately taxpayers—throughout the entire process.

  • The district is required by law to follow a strict, competitive bidding process for all construction projects. This process is designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and the best value for taxpayers.

    Here’s how it works:

    1. Detailed project specifications are developed with our architects and engineers so every bidder is pricing the same scope of work.

    2. Public bid advertisements are posted so qualified contractors can submit proposals.

    3. Sealed bids are opened at a public meeting on a specific date and time to ensure complete transparency.

    4. Review and verification are conducted to confirm each bid meets the project requirements, licensing, and bonding standards.

    5. The district awards the contract to the lowest responsible bidder—meaning the contractor who not only offers the lowest price but also meets all quality, safety, and performance criteria.

    Just as some community members pride themselves on scrutinizing bids and negotiating savings, the district does the same—leveraging the expertise of our architects, construction managers, and finance team to identify cost efficiencies and avoid unnecessary expenses. This approach has helped us complete past projects on time, within budget, and in some cases, under budget, returning unused funds to taxpayers.

  • Yes. The Minnesota Department of Education (MDE) issued a positive Review and Comment on the Cambridge-Isanti Schools facility plan. This means the state confirmed the plan is sound, fiscally responsible, and necessary.

    As required by MN Statute 123B.71, the MDE review process includes an analysis of building conditions, district finances, project scope, and community need. Receiving a positive Review and Comment is a key milestone that allows the district to move forward with voter consideration. This document is posted on our website and was published in the local newspaper for transparency.

Tax Impact & Cost

  • We have created a short video to walk through the Tax Impact Chart step by step (click here to watch video). You’ll notice we use the terms “average tax payer” and “increase” because each taxpayer’s situation looks different. 

    Some have asked about reports of the referendum costing $50 per month for the average taxpayer. That figure comes from incorrectly combining two pieces: the existing voter-approved debt (shown by the blue bars on the chart, which currently is about $34/month on the average assessed home) plus the new $16/month increase if both questions pass.

    Although existing voter approved debt (blue bars) slowly declines over the next 15 years, it is not completely paid off until the year 2040.

    This is why we explain the tax impact in terms of net change. Said differently, if both referendum questions on the ballot are approved this November, there will be an increase of $16 per month on the average household tax bill.

  • Only in the short term-and at a cost later. While this chart shows that current debt would decline without action, the need for repairs and updates to our school buildings doesn’t go away—it only becomes more expensive over time due to inflation and emergency fixes.

    In Minnesota, school districts can only fund major facility projects through voter-approved referendums. Approving the referendum now allows us to address critical needs in a planned, cost-effective way—helping avoid higher costs in the future and protecting our community’s investment.

  • Ehlers, Inc. is one of the Midwest’s most respected independent public financial advisory firms, with more than 65 years of experience serving school districts, cities, counties, utilities, and other government entities. They are not a bank, lender, or underwriter—meaning their advice is impartial and focused solely on the public’s best interest.

    Our district has partnered with Ehlers for many years. They know our community, our financial history, and our long-term goals, which allows them to provide advice that is both highly accurate and tailored to our needs. Their expertise extends beyond schools, having guided hundreds of public entities across Minnesota and neighboring states through successful facility, infrastructure, and capital improvement projects.

    For our district, Ehlers:

    • Analyzes finances, debt schedules, and tax impacts to develop the most cost-effective plans.

    • Structures and manages the competitive sale of bonds to secure the lowest possible interest rates.

    • Ensures all financing complies with state and federal requirements.

    • Provides clear, transparent financial information for our community.

    As an independent municipal advisor, Ehlers has a legal duty to act only in our community’s best interest. Their long-standing relationship with our district and decades of public-sector experience make them a trusted partner in helping us invest wisely for the future.

  • If approved, the bond referendum would result in the following estimated monthly tax impacts for a home valued at $300,000:

    • Question 1 is approximately a $5/month increase

    • Question 2 is approximately a $11/month increase (and requires passage of Q1) 

    • Both Questions: combined are approximately a $16/month increase

    This investment takes advantage of expiring debt to reduce the overall impact on local taxpayers while allowing for significant improvements districtwide.

    To calculate the impact for your property, click here.

  • Minnesota’s School Building Bond Agricultural Credit (AG2School Credit) provides landowners tax relief on school bonds by providing a 70% reduction for their agricultural property. It was created to help reduce and equalize taxes for agricultural landowners in districts where, historically, it was difficult to pass bonds because of how agricultural landowners were taxed. 

    Since the bill was passed, rural districts have been able to pass bonds that improve the quality of Greater Minnesota Education.

  • The average tax impact varies depending on property type and classification. For residential examples, we use a $300,000 assessed home value because that reflects the county average and is most relatable to voters.

    Commercial properties do not qualify for the Homestead Credit, so the cost may be slightly higher—but it depends on classification and valuation. To find the precise impact, business owners can use the tax calculator on this website by entering their parcel information.
    The calculator provides an estimate of the net increase in taxes, already accounting for existing debt retirement. This ensures that the total amount over the 25-year bond term will never exceed the estimates shown, and could be lower depending on final interest rates and property value growth.

    Many local business owners have already met with district leaders to review their specific situations and have emphasized the positive economic ripple effect of a successful referendum—through job creation, visitor spending, and stronger community investment.

  • Cambridge-Isanti Schools is committed to providing clear, accurate, and transparent information about the cost of the referendum. To ensure reliability, the district partners with Ehlers, Inc., an independent public financial advisory firm with decades of experience serving Minnesota school districts and local governments.

    Ehlers uses official county assessor data and the state’s standard tax impact formula to calculate all estimates, based on assessed property values—not fluctuating market prices—so results are consistent and fair for every taxpayer.

    The tax calculator on this website, also developed by Ehlers, shows the net change in taxes after accounting for existing debt retirement. This approach provides the most relevant information: the estimated monthly increase for a typical property. Listing a “total project cost per household” would be misleading because school bonds are repaid over time and across all property types, not as a flat household amount.

    These official figures are the same data used in every public presentation, chart, and FAQ. The district has a strong record of fiscal responsibility and transparency, completing past projects on time and within budget.

    Additionally, the district’s full referendum plan and financial assumptions received a positive Review and Comment from the Minnesota Department of Education, confirming that the proposal is fiscally sound and responsibly developed. That document is publicly available on the district’s website and was published in the local newspaper for transparency.

    Cambridge-Isanti Schools continues to share all calculations, background information, and the full tax calculator openly at C-ISchools.ReferendumFacts.org/the-investment, so every resident can review the facts and make an informed decision with confidence

  • We’re taking Advantage of Expiring Debt. That allows us to add $87.1M with only a $5/month increase. Without that expiring debt, the cost of Question 1 would have been much higher.

    Question 1 uses up all the savings from expiring debt, which keeps the cost low. Question 2 comes with the full cost of new debt, which is why it’s more expensive.

  • We use $300,000 because school taxes are based on a property’s assessed value, not its market value. In Isanti County, assessed values typically trail market values by about 85–90% in any given year. $300,000 is roughly 88% of the average market value referenced from a search of Zillow and falls within the historical range.

    For anyone who wants to know the exact impact on their own property, we provide a tax calculator on The Investment page.

  • While our community is very generous, the $36.5 million cost of a Fieldhouse is far beyond what donations or sponsorships could cover. Fundraising can enhance the facility once it’s built—through naming rights, advertising, or partnerships—but it cannot fund construction.

    That’s why the Fieldhouse is included in the referendum. Large public facilities require stable, long-term funding that only voter-approved bonds can provide, ensuring they are built and maintained to serve the community for decades.

    Importantly, the Fieldhouse will not only benefit students, but also attract tournaments, events, and visitors—generating new revenue for local businesses and strengthening our community’s economy.

  • The proposed bonds are layered with existing debt—a standard financial practice used to minimize spikes in tax impact.

    The bonds would be issued with a 25-year term, and all referendum obligations are scheduled to be paid by 2050. This structure ensures stable, predictable taxes over time.

    Importantly, the estimated tax impact represents the maximum possible amount—the final impact will likely be lower, but never higher, than the estimates shared publicly

The Needs

  • For many years, our district has worked hard to maintain safe and efficient schools with the limited resources available. Minnesota provides about $1 per square foot for long-term facility maintenance—far below the $4 per square foot recommended by national experts. This funding gap makes it impossible for districts to keep pace with true costs.

    A 2020 facility assessment completed by Kraus Anderson identified $77 million in deferred maintenance needs. By prioritizing critical projects and using creative planning, we reduced that backlog to $45 million currently—without asking taxpayers for more. These efforts show our strong commitment to responsible stewardship.

    Even so, the gap between state funding and actual needs continues to grow. Like most Minnesota schools, addressing these needs requires a community-supported bond referendum. This is not mismanagement, but the reality of how districts and communities work together to keep schools safe, modern, and welcoming.

    Now we are asking our community to join us in addressing the remaining $45 million in needs, so students and staff have the facilities they deserve—today and into the future.

  • Like most Minnesota school districts, our District faces a significant amount of deferred maintenance, and we are committed to addressing these needs strategically. The district has made progress addressing critical infrastructure needs – all without increasing taxes – however our budget does not cover all of the needs in our District. 

    Many of our facilities require significant updates due to their age. Their wear is evident, highlighting the need for improvement. At the same time, we have an opportunity to reimagine both the appearance and functionality of our buildings to meet modern learning needs.

  • We are committed to our mission to educate, empower, and inspire every student, every day. As part of our strategic priority to modernize learning spaces, we recognize that where students learn matters. Modern learning environments look and function differently than traditional classrooms—offering flexible, student-centered spaces that support collaboration, creativity, and real-world learning.

    Instead of fixed rows of desks, modern classrooms feature adaptable layouts, breakout areas for small group work, integrated technology, natural light, and furnishings that encourage movement and engagement. These spaces are designed to support a wide range of teaching approaches and learning styles—helping every Bluejacket feel connected, challenged, and ready to thrive.

    Investing in these environments is not about aesthetics; it’s about giving our students and educators the tools and settings they need to succeed. Whether it’s project-based learning, career-focused labs in areas like robotics or healthcare, or collaborative problem-solving exercises, modern learning spaces help prepare Bluejackets for the future. Just like a lab equips a scientist to do their best work, a modern classroom empowers Bluejackets to reach their full potential.

    Click here for examples of modern learning environments.

  • The district has made significant progress in improving our facilities and addressing critical infrastructure needs through innovative solutions. Similar to classroom funding, the financial resources allocated to facility maintenance are often insufficient to cover all deferred maintenance requirements. Our district's buildings vary widely in age, with some as new as five years old and others nearing a century.

    In 2022, we implemented a strategic and creative plan to invest $18 million in critical infrastructure improvements, energy efficiency upgrades, and other essential projects—all without increasing taxes. This initiative has allowed us to preserve and enhance our oldest buildings while ensuring a safe and modern learning environment for students and staff.

    Our facilities are built on solid foundations, but many require significant updates due to their age. Their wear is evident, highlighting the need for improvement. At the same time, we have a valuable opportunity to reimagine both the appearance and functionality of our buildings, transforming them to meet the needs of a modern learning environment.

  • School district facilities are community assets, but like most Minnesota school districts, our district faces a significant amount of deferred maintenance, and we are committed to addressing these needs strategically. A portion of the required work can be funded through our Long-Term Facilities Maintenance (LTFM) funds, which provide essential support for facility upkeep. However, the total maintenance needs exceed the available funding.

    For this reason, this will be part of the comprehensive facility plan the Task Force will develop over the coming months. Our objective is to systematically address the most pressing maintenance concerns while working toward a sustainable future where LTFM funds are sufficient to maintain our facilities for years to come.

  • Several key facilities needs have been identified to support our growing and dynamic community and fall into the following categories: 

    • Deferred Maintenance: Address overdue maintenance to ensure our facilities are safe and functional. 

    • Safety and Security: Enhance safety measures to provide a secure learning environment for all students and staff. 

    • Capacity: Expand our facilities to accommodate increasing student enrollment and community growth. 

    • Modernization and Innovative Learning Spaces: Create learning environments that support programming demands and foster creativity and innovation. 

    • Recreation, Athletics, and Activities: Improve and expand spaces for sports, recreation, and extracurricular activities to support student well-being and engagement. 

    These needs reflect our commitment to providing a high-quality educational experience for every member of our community. 

  • Question 2 helps meet long-identified needs in our community by including the development of a Community Fieldhouse—a versatile indoor facility designed for use by both schools and the broader community.

    The proposed Fieldhouse would include a walking/running track, fitness areas, locker rooms, and public meeting space. It would be open for community use, offering new opportunities for wellness, recreation, and connection—especially during Minnesota’s long winter months.

    Importantly, these amenities reflect the top features identified in a recent regional study by Visible Cities. The study highlighted community priorities for a potential center, and features like indoor walking space and flexible recreation areas were among the highest-ranked by local residents.

    The Community Fieldhouse is a meaningful step forward, expanding access to a multi-use space that supports student activities, healthy lifestyles, and community connection for residents of all ages.

  • The referendum items are grouped into broader categories—like safety and security improvements, mechanical upgrades, classroom renovations, and site work—so the community can clearly see the priorities and how the work supports our schools. A nearly 60-member Community Task Force—made up of parents, staff, students, business owners, and local residents—reviewed the facility assessments, cost estimates, and priorities in depth. This group carefully examined the detailed lists, asked questions, debated options, and developed the recommendations now before voters.

    The district is committed to transparency and would love for community members to reach out. These details have been shared in public meetings, community presentations, and task force sessions, and anyone who wants to review the full list of line items is encouraged to call or schedule an appointment. We are happy to answer questions and walk you through every detail.

    The district’s goal is to keep the community informed while making the information clear, accessible, and focused on the improvements that matter most for safety, learning, and community use.

  • The new pathways are not optional - they are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to ensure full accessibility for individuals with limited mobility and other physical needs.

    If you’ve attended sporting events at our high school over the years, you know that our current pathways are not sufficient. Uneven surfaces, steep grades, and limited accessible routes make it difficult for many to get to the stands, restrooms, and other facilities.

    These improvements are about more than compliance—they ensure that all community members can attend school events, regardless of age or disability. Safer, more accessible pathways mean grandparents, parents with strollers, veterans, and individuals with mobility challenges can participate fully in our school and community life.

  • This investment is part of the district’s deferred maintenance plan to upgrade building automation systems—specifically the heating, cooling, and ventilation controls in our schools. The graphics are the interface that maintenance staff use to monitor and adjust HVAC systems across all district buildings.

    Upgrading this technology improves indoor air quality for students and staff by allowing more precise control of temperature, airflow, and filtration. It also makes HVAC systems much more efficient—helping reduce utility costs by an estimated 20–40% through smarter scheduling, occupancy sensing, and system optimization.

    This is a practical investment that supports health, comfort, and long-term cost savings for the district, students, and staff.

  • These items are essential replacements, not luxuries, ensuring safety, compliance, and reliability for students, staff, and the community.

    • Athletic field lights: Installed in the 1970s, these lights are at the end of their life. They provide poor visibility, have caused safety concerns -worth noting, one fixture even caught fire during a soccer game last year. Replacing them ensures safe, reliable lighting for all school and community events.

    • Performing Arts Center (PAC) curtains: The curtains have reached the end of their life and need replacement to meet current fire safety codes. The PAC is a valued space for school performances, local productions, concerts, and community events, and these upgrades help protect this important resource.

    • Wireless microphones: The current microphones are outdated and unreliable. New microphones are essential for instruction, performances, presentations, and community events throughout the district.

    These updates support safety, accessibility, and compliance while maintaining spaces that serve thousands of students and community members every year.

  • This walkway is actually a catwalk over the media center, a central hub of learning in the school. In recent years, it has posed a serious fall risk for students, and several safety incidents have occurred. Adding a fully enclosed glass barrier will eliminate this risk while preserving the only source of natural light in the space.

    If we used solid sheetrock instead of glass, the media center would lose all natural light—significantly changing the atmosphere and learning experience for students. The glass solution keeps the area bright, welcoming, and safe.

    It’s also worth noting that this improvement represents less than one penny per month for the average household as part of the referendum, yet it delivers a meaningful safety upgrade for students.

  • While our district has done a commendable job maintaining facilities and addressing critical infrastructure needs, the reality is that aging systems eventually reach the end of their useful life. Mechanical systems, roofing, interiors, and exteriors now require replacement—not just repair. This is not a reflection of neglect, but of natural lifecycle expiration. Updating our aging buildings now avoids more expensive emergency repairs or replacements later. 

    Moreover, educational needs have evolved. Our current learning environments lack the flexibility, technology, and specialized spaces that are now standard in modern education. These limitations impact our ability to deliver high-quality instruction and offer the same educational experiences as other districts in our area.

  • Expanding and strengthening Career & Technical Education (CTE)—also known as vocational programming—is a major priority in this referendum. Our community has made it clear—they want more opportunities for students to graduate with real-world skills, industry certifications, and pathways to high-demand careers. This plan directly invests in making that happen across trades, technology, healthcare, and other emerging fields.

    The referendum would:

    • Renovate and expand CTE/vocational classrooms and labs for trades such as manufacturing, construction, welding, automotive technology, agriculture, and culinary arts.

    • Upgrade equipment and technology to meet current industry standards, preparing students for immediate employment or advanced technical training.

    • Create flexible learning spaces to support emerging programs in healthcare, IT, and other high-demand fields.

    • Improve safety and functionality in hands-on learning areas, ensuring modern, well-equipped environments.

    For example, the proposed culinary arts lab is not a luxury—it’s a career-preparation space where students gain hands-on experience in food science, nutrition, hospitality, and business skills. Just like agriculture is evolving with drones and precision technology, every industry is changing rapidly. We must prepare students for a future we can’t fully imagine yet, with facilities that mirror the real-world environments they’ll encounter.

    These investments build on the success of our current programs, which have already saved families millions in tuition through industry certifications and college credit opportunities. By expanding CTE/vocational capacity, we strengthen our local workforce, support area businesses, and give our students the competitive edge they deserve in a rapidly changing world.

  • From the very beginning, this proposal has addressed a broad set of needs identified through years of community and stakeholder input, facility assessments, and careful planning—not just maintenance. Replacing aging systems and addressing deferred maintenance is one important part of the plan, but the full package also includes:

    • Safety and security improvements

    • Modernizing learning spaces and technology upgrades

    • Capacity solutions to address enrollment pressures

    • Enhancing community-accessible recreational, athletic, and activity spaces

    These priorities came directly from the work of a nearly 60-member Community Task Force, which included parents, staff, students, business owners, civic leaders, and residents. The Task Force carefully reviewed facility assessments, staff and community surveys, and professional studies before recommending a plan that balances maintenance needs with improvements to support learning, safety, and community use.

    From the start, this referendum has been about the full vision for our schools. Our communications, presentations, and website have consistently shared the full scope of the plan, highlighting both essential maintenance and meaningful improvements for students and the community.

  • Restroom updates in the referendum focus on privacy, safety, and accessibility for everyone. Many of our restrooms are original to the buildings, making them outdated, harder to maintain, and not fully aligned with current building codes or accessibility standards.

    The updated designs include modern, single-user restrooms in key locations. These provide greater privacy for all students and visitors—similar to restrooms you see in restaurants, coffee shops, airports, and shopping centers. This approach reduces wait times, improves safety and cleanliness, and ensures restrooms are welcoming for everyone, including those with disabilities, health needs, or young children.

    These improvements also address practical needs:

    • Ensuring ADA compliance so facilities are accessible to all

    • Replacing aging plumbing fixtures to reduce maintenance costs and water usage

    • Updating ventilation, lighting, and finishes to meet current health and safety standards

    These common-sense updates bring our facilities up to the same standard you’d expect in other public places, while ensuring privacy and respect for every individual who uses them.

  • The referendum includes $1.7 million to install artificial turf at the high school stadium—a practical, long-term investment that improves safety, increases access, and reduces ongoing maintenance costs.

    Research comparing artificial turf and natural grass fields has produced mixed results. Some studies show slightly higher rates of certain lower-extremity injuries on turf, while others find no difference—or even lower injury rates—depending on field condition, footwear, and upkeep. What matters most for safety is consistent maintenance and surface quality. Modern turf systems include shock-absorbing layers and advanced infill materials that help reduce risk and ensure reliable playing conditions throughout the year.

    In Minnesota, natural grass fields are often unplayable for long stretches due to rain, snow, and freeze–thaw cycles. These conditions lead to frequent cancellations, uneven surfaces, and higher injury risks. Installing turf helps address these challenges by providing:

    • Consistent, safe playing conditions for physical education, athletics, and community activities

    • Extended seasonal use from early spring through late fall

    • Cost efficiency over time, eliminating expenses for watering, mowing, fertilizing, re-sodding, and field rotation

    • Environmental benefits, including reduced water use, no fertilizer or pesticide application, and prevention of chemical runoff

    • Expanded access for physical education, adapted programs, youth sports, marching band, and community events

    • Positive local economic impact through tournaments and activities that bring visitors to area businesses

    Modern turf systems are also manufactured without PFAS and are recyclable at end-of-life. Across Minnesota and the nation, hundreds of high schools, colleges, and recreation programs safely use turf to maximize safety, durability, and community access.

    Over time, the savings in maintenance and the increased year-round use of the facility help offset the initial investment, making it a responsible, sustainable choice. Cambridge-Isanti is currently the only district of its size in Minnesota without turf, continuing to face the limitations and higher long-term costs of natural grass. This investment is about safety, opportunity, and long-term value for students and the community alike.

The Investment

  • This comprehensive plan would enhance the safety, security, and accessibility of our buildings. It would also improve learning environments for our students, as well as sports, recreational, and activity spaces for our community – providing improved learning spaces at all of our schools so we can continue to educate, empower, and inspire every student every day.

  • Without new bonds, the school tax—about $34/month on a $300,000 home—would decrease gradually through 2040 as existing debt is paid off. There would be no immediate drop in taxes. This referendum is the community’s plan, developed through years of input from residents, parents and students, business owners, civic leaders, and a nearly 60-member Community Task Force to avoid more costly problems in the future.

    Choosing not to invest now means facing higher costs from inflation (about $6 million per year in lost project value), emergency repairs that pull resources from teachers and classrooms, outdated and inefficient buildings, and missed grant or partnership opportunities. Minnesota provides only $1 per square foot for facility upkeep—well below the $4 recommended—so local bonds are the only way to maintain safe, functional schools.

    This proposal continues the current debt level the community is accustomed to, with a modest $16/month increase (if both questions pass), and time for the new debt to “wrap around” retiring debt so tax impact stays stable. We have presented this financing approach openly in public meetings, task force sessions, and online at C-ISchools.ReferendumFacts.org.

  • We are committed to our mission to educate, empower, and inspire every student, every day. As part of our strategic priority to modernize learning spaces, we recognize that where students learn matters. Modern learning environments look and function differently than traditional classrooms—offering flexible, student-centered spaces that support collaboration, creativity, and real-world learning.

    Instead of fixed rows of desks, modern classrooms feature adaptable layouts, breakout areas for small group work, integrated technology, natural light, and furnishings that encourage movement and engagement. These spaces are designed to support a wide range of teaching approaches and learning styles—helping every Bluejacket feel connected, challenged, and ready to thrive.

    Investing in these environments is not about aesthetics; it’s about giving our students and educators the tools and settings they need to succeed. Whether it’s project-based learning, career-focused labs in areas like robotics or healthcare, or collaborative problem-solving exercises, modern learning spaces help prepare Bluejackets for the future. Just like a lab equips a scientist to do their best work, a modern classroom empowers Bluejackets to reach their full potential.

  • No—none of the funds from the 2021 operating levy were used for building improvements. Operating levies are strictly limited by law and can only be used for day-to-day school operations. In our case, the 2021 Levy for Learning was specifically approved by voters to help hire and retain quality teachers and expand career and vocational education opportunities for students.

    Thanks to that support, we’ve strengthened our instructional programs and improved our financial stability. However, those dollars cannot be used for facility repairs, upgrades, or construction.

    At the same time, many of our school buildings are aging—some approaching 100 years old—and require significant updates to remain safe, efficient, and functional for today’s learning needs. While we’ve made strategic improvements using limited maintenance funds and innovative solutions, the scope of deferred maintenance and the need for modern learning spaces has outpaced what our operating budget can cover.

    That’s why a bond referendum is needed now. It’s the only funding mechanism available to Minnesota school districts to address major facility needs. By investing in our schools through this plan, we can preserve our shared assets, protect learning time, and ensure our students and community have access to safe, secure, and future-ready spaces for decades to come.

  • Yes. The $5 per month estimate is accurate for the average residential homestead in our district for Question 1 only. It’s based on certified tax impact data from Ehlers, our independent municipal financial advisor.

    These tax impact figures represent the maximum total cost to the taxpayer and include both the principal and interest on the referendum bonds over the full repayment period.

    Some community members have shared different numbers, but those calculations are not based on how Minnesota property taxes actually work. Property taxes are determined by a state formula that considers each property’s value and classification—so the cost isn’t the same for every household.

    • Homeowners with properties near the district’s average value will see about $5 per month for Question 1. If both Question 1 and Question 2 are approved, the median residential homestead impact is about $16 per month.

    • Businesses, farms, and higher-value homes generally pay more, which lowers the average cost for most homeowners.

    All district estimates come directly from official tax base and valuation data verified through state formulas—not a simple division of total project cost by the number of homes.

    For the most accurate number for your property, use the Tax Impact Calculator on The Investment page of this site.

  • Yes. Investments in safe, well-maintained, and modern learning environments directly impact student achievement. Updated classrooms and specialized spaces allow for more effective instruction, hands-on learning, and access to technology and resources that prepare students for today’s world. Improved ventilation, lighting, and room design also support focus, reduce distractions, and promote physical well-being—all of which are proven to enhance learning in reading, writing, math, and beyond.

    In short, this referendum is about more than buildings—it’s about creating the conditions where every student can learn and succeed.

  • Yes. Updating and modernizing our school facilities is a responsible, forward-looking investment in our community’s future. High-quality schools are a cornerstone of vibrant communities—they attract new families, stabilize neighborhoods, and help protect property values. When school buildings are well-designed and well-maintained, they reflect a community that values education, growth, and quality of life.

    Modern spaces also ensure that public dollars are being used efficiently. Flexible, updated environments reduce long-term maintenance costs and can adapt to changing needs over time. These updates make our schools more functional and more appealing, supporting the broader goal of making our community a place where people want to live, work, and raise a family.

    Investing in schools is investing in the strength and stability of the community—and it’s one of the best ways to ensure that taxpayer dollars have lasting impact.

Voting Information

  • Because this is a special election, only the two Cambridge-Isanti Schools questions will appear on the ballot. The second question is structured to build on the first, so it can only move forward if the first question is also approved:

    • Question 1: Shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 911 (Cambridge-Isanti Schools), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $87,100,000, to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of all school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, construction and equipping of additional classroom spaces in elementary buildings to increase capacity; safety and security improvements at facilities; deferred maintenance projects; renovations and updates to learning environments; and improvements to athletic and activity facilities?

    • Question 2: If School District Ballot Question 1 is approved, shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 911 (Cambridge-Isanti Schools), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $36,475,000, to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, expansion of and renovations to the indoor fieldhouse at the Cambridge-Isanti High School?

  • Our community survey confirmed that safety, learning spaces, and infrastructure are top priorities, with strong support also for updates to athletic, recreation, and activity spaces. After reviewing facility needs and survey feedback, the Community Task Force recommended giving voters the chance to decide on each solution separately.

    • Question 1 focuses on safety, security, learning spaces, and infrastructure.

    • Question 2 proposes a new fieldhouse to benefit students and the community with spaces for gymnastics, track, fitness, and more.

  • Absentee voting begins September 19, 2025 and ends November 3, 2025. To request a mail ballot:

    • Complete the Absentee Voter Application

    • Submit it to mallen@c-ischools.org; OR

    • Mail it to Attn: Elections, 625 Main St N, Cambridge.

    Registering to vote will be included in the voting process for those who are not currently registered to vote.

    Submitting your application prior to October 20 will ensure there is enough time to receive, complete, and send back your ballot before November 4.

  • Beginning September 19, 2025, voters can visit the Education Services Center (District Office) or Cambridge-Isanti High School to vote:

    • Education Services Center (District Office)
      625 Main St N, Cambridge, MN 55008
      Mondays-Fridays from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM
      September 19-November 3

    • Cambridge-Isanti High School
      430 8th Ave NW, Cambridge, MN 55008
      Mondays-Fridays from 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM; extended to 8 PM on Thursdays.
      September 19-November 3 (Closed October 10, 16, & 17)
      Open Saturday, November 1 from 9:00 AM to 3:00 PM

    • Cambridge Primary School
      310 Elm St N, Cambridge MN 55008
      Only open Friday, October 24 from 5:00 p.m.-8:00 p.m.

    In Minnesota, you can register to vote on the same day you vote. Unregistered voters should bring a photo ID (typically a valid driver’s license) or another acceptable identification for voter registration. 

  • Election day is November 4, 2025. Polls will be open from 7 am to 8 pm at TWO combined polling locations:

    1. CAMBRIDGE FIRE HALL POLLING LOCATION SERVES:  Residents of City of Cambridge Precincts 1 & 2, Dalbo Township, Maple Ridge Township, Cambridge Township, Stanchfield Township, Springvale Township, Wyanett Township, and Fish Lake Township will vote at the Cambridge Fire Hall (300 3rd Ave NE, Cambridge, MN 55008).

    2. ISANTI COMMUNITY CENTER POLLING LOCATION SERVES:  Residents of City of Isanti Precincts 1 & 2, Athens Township, Bradford Township, Isanti Township, Oxford Township, Spencer Brook Township, Stanford Township, and North Branch Township will vote at the Isanti Community Center (208.5 First Ave NW, Isanti, MN 55040)

    If you are unsure of where to vote, you can find your polling location at pollfinder.sos.mn.gov.

  • Because this is a stand-alone school district special election, state law requires that the school district administer all election duties. This includes managing absentee (early) voting, hiring and training election judges, operating polling places, and gathering and reporting election results.

    When an election happens on a day other than a state Election Day, the school district clerk serves as the chief election official unless those duties are formally delegated to the county auditor (who must agree to accept them). If the county manages absentee voting, the district reimburses the county for related costs. (Minn. Stat. § 203B.05, subd. 2)

    Relevant statutes: Minn. Stat. §§ 203B.05, 203B.11, 204B.16, 205A.10 subds. 2–3, and 205A.11

  • Minnesota law allows the election authority—here, the school district—to designate early voting (absentee) locations, including public buildings such as schools and district offices.

    • Minn. Stat. § 203B.081 authorizes in-person absentee voting in the office of the election clerk or in other polling places designated for that purpose.

    • The district clerk designates the sites, establishes voting hours, and provides public notice.

    • Each site is staffed by trained election judges, following all legal standards for voter verification, ballot security, and accessibility.

    Hosting early voting in well-known, accessible community buildings ensures transparency and convenience for local voters.

  • Although the district administers this election, county election officials provide oversight and training to make sure all procedures meet state and federal requirements.

    Under Minn. Stat. §§ 204B.25 and 204B.28, county auditors must train school district clerks, election judges, and ballot board members before the election. Training covers election laws, duties, ballot handling, voter verification, accessibility standards, and security of voting materials.

    Election judges are sworn officials who uphold state election law and maintain fairness at each polling place. They receive formal training from the county auditor and often mentor newer judges and site staff to ensure accuracy and consistency throughout the process.

    The county auditor also administers UOCAVA (Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act) absentee ballots under Minn. Stat. § 203B.05, subd. 2, ensuring military and overseas voters can participate in every election.

    1. The school district clerk formally designates the early voting sites and posts public notice.

    2. Election judges, trained and certified under Minn. Stat. §§ 204B.19–204B.22, staff each location.

    3. Voters check in, verify eligibility, and complete a voter certificate.

    4. Ballots are issued, marked privately, and placed in a secure ballot box.

    5. At the close of each day, ballots are sealed, logged, and stored securely under chain-of-custody.

    6. The district’s ballot board, established under Minn. Stat. § 203B.121, reviews and accepts or rejects ballots before counting.

    7. After polls close on Election Day, the district canvassing board certifies results (Minn. Stat. § 205A.10, subd. 3).

  • All Minnesota elections—whether run by a county, city, or school district—follow the same legal standards for ballot handling, data security, and transparency.

    • Election judges are trained and sworn to maintain impartiality and follow strict procedures.

    • Every ballot is tracked through a documented chain of custody.

    • Ballot boards review and accept or reject ballots according to statute.

    County auditors audit and train district officials to ensure compliance.

Community Involvement

  • Since 2019, Cambridge-Isanti Schools’ Administration and School Board—working in partnership with our community—have taken intentional steps to stabilize finances and shape a long-term vision for our schools. That vision is not ours alone; it reflects years of input from families, students, staff, local businesses, and civic leaders through surveys, listening sessions, and task force work.

    Key contributors to this process included:

    • Strategic Planning & Facility Task Forces: Two distinct community-based groups—one focused on long-term vision and another on facility needs—brought together over 120 members including families, students, staff, local business owners, and civic leaders. These task forces evaluated data, identified priorities, and formally recommended the plan to the School Board.

    • District Leadership: Conducted in-depth reviews of building conditions, enrollment trends, academic programming, and budget capacity to support a practical and responsible solution.

    • Professional Consultants: The District partnered with an experienced E–12 facilities planning firm to assess infrastructure needs and help develop a comprehensive plan tailored to our community.

    • Staff & Community Feedback: Surveys and listening sessions gathered valuable insights from hundreds of staff members and residents, helping to shape and refine potential solutions.

    • School Board: After reviewing all data, feedback, and recommendations, the School Board unanimously voted to move forward with a bond referendum.

    This multi-year, community-led process has resulted in a plan that protects our shared investments, supports modern teaching and learning, and creates safe, welcoming, and accessible schools where every Bluejacket student—and our whole community—can thrive.

  • The Community Task Force reflected our district’s diversity, bringing together nearly 60 members—including parents, grandparents, students, staff, postsecondary educators, retirees, local government officials, public safety representatives, and leaders from agriculture, healthcare, manufacturing, small and large businesses, and civic organizations across every part of our district.

    Invitations were emailed districtwide, posted publicly, and included in community mailers. No one who expressed interest was turned away. While some district employees participated as taxpayers and community members, the majority of members were not employees.

    Importantly, the group represented a broad range of fiscal perspectives—from highly tax-conscious residents to those prioritizing program growth. After seven meetings, tours, and robust discussion, every member—through a blind ballot—supported the same recommendation.

    This balance of voices ensured the final plan reflected community priorities, fiscal stewardship, and long-term student success.

    • We are grateful for the many ways our community continues to shape this work. Through surveys, listening sessions, and ongoing conversations, your voices guide each step of the process. To keep everyone connected, this Referendum Website offers updates, survey results, task force summaries, timelines, FAQs, and opportunities to stay involved.

  • If you have questions about the referendum, we’d love to hear from you! Simply fill out the “Connect with Us” form at the bottom of this page, and a member of our team will gladly follow up. We also encourage you to attend one of the upcoming referendum information events to learn more and get your questions answered.