FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Referendum

  • Our School Board unanimously approved a resolution to hold a special election on Tuesday, November 4, 2025 to address our District's long-term facilities needs. This is a capital referendum that would allow our District to issue debt for significant districtwide facilities improvements. The ballot will include two questions seeking voter approval for a school building bond.

    If approved, these investments will support the construction and equipping of additional classroom spaces to increase capacity; safety and security enhancements; deferred maintenance projects; renovations and updates to learning environments; and improvements to athletic and activity facilities.

  • Since 2019 Cambridge-Isanti Schools’ Administration and School Board have taken thoughtful and intentional steps to restore the District’s financial health and develop a comprehensive, long-term plan to protect our community’s assets. The last five years of planning, development and community engagement have included:

    • Strengthening the District’s financial health through a combination of expense reductions and the 2021 operating referendum.

    • Developing a community-based Strategic Plan to align resources and priorities that are focused on the future.

    • Completing a districtwide comprehensive facility study to identify and prioritize our District’s facility challenges.

    • Surveying community members to gather feedback and prioritize potential solutions.

    • Assembling a 50+ person community task force to review facility study data and community survey data, and make a recommendation to the School Board about next steps. 

    All of this careful and collaborative work helped inform the School Board’s final decision to pursue a bond referendum on November 4, 2025. For more details on the facilities planning timeline, click here

  • Shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 911 (Cambridge-Isanti Schools), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $87,100,000, to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of all school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, construction and equipping of additional classroom spaces in elementary buildings to increase capacity; safety and security improvements at facilities; deferred maintenance projects; renovations and updates to learning environments; and improvements to athletic and activity facilities?

  • If School District Ballot Question 1 is approved, shall the School Board of Independent School District No. 911 (Cambridge-Isanti Schools), Minnesota be authorized to issue general obligation school building bonds in an amount not to exceed $36,475,000, to provide funds for the acquisition and betterment of school sites and facilities including, but not limited to, expansion of and renovations to the indoor fieldhouse at the Cambridge-Isanti High School?

  • QUESTION ONE (1) would provide funding to improve safety and security, repair aging building infrastructure, and modernize learning spaces in each of our buildings. The priorities include:

    Modernizing & Updating Learning Environments  

    • Classroom additions for WL, SPED, and ELL, new labs for culinary arts, robotics, certified nurse assistant, and CNC/machine coding. (CIHS)

    • Reconfigure student services, counseling, and health office spaces and relocate the career center for increased access/use. (CIHS)

    • Remodel learning commons to create more small group rooms, maker spaces, STEM space, and/or speech areas. (CIHS, CIS, CPS, IPS)

    • Update performing arts with new curtains, dressing room, and lighting, as well PA and mic upgrades. (CIHS)

    • Add sinks, power drops, and casework to IIS STEM lab for improved safety, flexibility, and organization. 

    • Build a new addition at IPS for cafeteria, kitchen/receiving, adventure center, small group rooms and main entrance/office. 

    • Add new entry at IPS with expanded parent drop-off and reconfigure early childhood parking. 

    • Reconfigure existing spaces to create additional space for special education, and early childhood needs. (CIS, IPS)

    • Create small group and breakout spaces. 

    • Repurpose underutilized spaces to create special education rooms, offices, and storage. (CPS, IPS)

    • Update furniture for more collaborative learning districtwide.

    Enhancing Safety and Security

    • Enhance entrance security for early childhood at CIS and IPS

    • Replace outdated fire alarms, door access, and security camera systems.

    • Improve ADA accessibility at multiple sites (ADA paths, ramps, parking, hardscapes).

    • Add a secure public entrance for IMS auditorium/recreational spaces that is separate from the school entrance.

    Addressing Deferred Maintenance 

    • Repair exteriors including masonry and structural needs, exterior metal panels and trim, as well as sections of windows and doors.

    • Replace aging plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems (ex; supply fans from 1967, welding shop ventilation/exhaust system from 2002).

    • Renew interior flooring, ceilings, casework, doors, walls, lockers, and bleachers.

    Improving Recreation, Athletic and Activity Spaces 

    • Add tennis courts and lighting, as well as updates to baseball field (lights, fencing, bleachers, and storage), turf stadium, and varsity softball field (lighting, sound, & ADA pathway) at CIHS.

      VIEW CONCEPT PLANS HERE

    QUESTION TWO (2) would provide funding to improve and expand spaces for physical education, community recreation, athletics, and extracurricular activities. Priorities include:

    • Build a new fieldhouse at the high school that would include four multi-purpose courts (physical education, basketball, volleyball, pickleball, etc) a competition track and gymnastics space on the lower level, as well as a walking/running track and fitness room on the upper-level for community use. 

    • Provide physical education and athletic storage areas, school store, community entry and gathering space, as well as additional parking.

      VIEW CONCEPT PLANS HERE

  • If approved, the bond referendum would result in the following estimated monthly tax impacts for a home valued at $300,000:

    • Question 1 is approximately a $5/month increase

    • Question 2 is approximately a $11/month increase (and requires passage of Q1) 

    • Both Questions: combined are approximately a $16/month increase

    This investment takes advantage of expiring debt to reduce the overall impact on local taxpayers while allowing for significant improvements districtwide.

    To calculate the impact for your property, click here.

  • Minnesota’s School Building Bond Agricultural Credit (AG2School Credit) provides landowners tax relief on school bonds by providing a 70% reduction for their agricultural property. It was created to help reduce and equalize taxes for agricultural landowners in districts where, historically, it was difficult to pass bonds because of how agricultural landowners were taxed. 

    Since the bill was passed, rural districts have been able to pass bonds that improve the quality of Greater Minnesota Education.

  • This comprehensive plan would enhance the safety, security, and accessibility of our buildings. It would also improve learning environments for our students, as well as sports, recreational, and activity spaces for our community – providing improved learning spaces at all of our schools so we can continue to educate, empower, and inspire every student every day.

  • It is no surprise our community survey indicated improvements for safety, learning spaces and infrastructure as the highest priority. However, the survey also indicated a majority of respondents supported updates to multi-use spaces for athletics, recreation and extra-curricular activities. After reviewing all of our facility needs, potential solutions, and survey data with the Community Task Force the consensus reached was to provide voters with the opportunity to consider these solutions individually.

    Question one addresses safety, security, learning spaces, and infrastructure. Question two provides a new fieldhouse to support both student and community activities – including gymnastics, track, and fitness spaces. 

    • Operational Levies are for Learning. An operating levy (sometimes also referred to as an operating referendum) is an election asking voters to provide funds that the district uses to run and operate its schools. An operating levy is for running the educational programs at the school and goes to the district’s general fund to support students. These funds cannot be used for construction and maintenance. 

    • Bond Referendums are for Buildings. A bond referendum is an election asking voters to provide funds that the school district uses for new construction, updates to existing facilities, and other additions to school properties. These funds cannot be used for operational purposes.

  • A smaller portion of the district’s existing debt is scheduled to mature in 2028, followed by the retirement of a larger portion in 2031. The proposed referendum is designed to strategically leverage this expiring debt to minimize the tax impact on the community.

  • Absentee voting begins September 19, 2025 and ends November 3, 2025. To request a mail ballot:

    • Complete the Absentee Voter Application

    • Submit it to mallen@c-ischools.org; OR

    • Mail it to Attn: Elections, 625 Main St N, Cambridge.

    Registering to vote will be included in the voting process for those who are not currently registered to vote.

    Submitting your application prior to October 20 will ensure there is enough time to receive, complete, and send back your ballot before November 4.

  • Beginning September 19, 2025, voters can visit the Education Services Center (District Office) or Cambridge-Isanti High School to vote:

    • Education Services Center (District Office)
      625 Main St N, Cambridge, MN 55008
      Mondays-Fridays from 7:30 AM to 4:30 PM
      September 19-November 3

    • Cambridge-Isanti High School
      430 8th Ave NW, Cambridge, MN 55008
      During School Hours (on School Days Only)
      September 19-November 3

    In Minnesota, you can register to vote on the same day you vote. Unregistered voters should bring a photo ID (typically a valid driver’s license) or another acceptable identification for voter registration. 

  • Election day is November 4, 2025. Polls will be open from 7 am to 8 pm at TWO combined polling locations:

    1. CAMBRIDGE FIRE HALL POLLING LOCATION SERVES:  Residents of City of Cambridge Precincts 1 & 2, Dalbo Township, Maple Ridge Township, Cambridge Township, Stanchfield Township, Springvale Township, Wyanett Township, and Fish Lake Township will vote at the Cambridge Fire Hall (300 3rd Ave NE, Cambridge, MN 55008).

    2. ISANTI COMMUNITY CENTER POLLING LOCATION SERVES:  Residents of City of Isanti Precincts 1 & 2, Athens Township, Bradford Township, Isanti Township, Oxford Township, Spencer Brook Township, Stanford Township, and North Branch Township will vote at the Isanti Community Center (208.5 First Ave NW, Isanti, MN 55040)

    If you are unsure of where to vote, you can find your polling location at pollfinder.sos.mn.gov.

  • In 2019 Cambridge-Isanti Schools faced financial challenges – being a year away from statutory operating debt and having less than a 5% fund balance – and implemented $7.5 million in budget cuts over two years. Recognizing the need for additional funding, the district also sought an operating referendum which, after two attempts, was approved by the community and helped the district become financially healthy.

    While we have been addressing HVAC, parking, and energy efficiency improvements without impacting property taxes, the school district recognized the need for a strategic plan to align resources and focus district priorities for the future. A community task force was created in 2022 and, after six months of collaborative community-based planning, developed strategic priorities which the school board approved in December 2022.

    One of the four strategic priorities included creating and maintaining an innovative, comprehensive master plan in order to intentionally plan for our future facilities and programming needs. To achieve this, we have spent the last two years working with a K-12 Facilities Planning Consultant to develop a comprehensive facility plan for our district. 

    Currently, we are reviewing the needs of aging facilities, community growth, programming needs, and its financial picture as we consider next steps. To ensure we are prioritizing the right projects for our district and our community, a facility planning task force has been assembled to evaluate all the district’s facility needs and provide input on solutions.

  • No—none of the funds from the 2021 operating levy were used for building improvements. Operating levies are strictly limited by law and can only be used for day-to-day school operations. In our case, the 2021 Levy for Learning was specifically approved by voters to help hire and retain quality teachers and expand career and vocational education opportunities for students.

    Thanks to that support, we’ve strengthened our instructional programs and improved our financial stability. However, those dollars cannot be used for facility repairs, upgrades, or construction.

    At the same time, many of our school buildings are aging—some approaching 100 years old—and require significant updates to remain safe, efficient, and functional for today’s learning needs. While we’ve made strategic improvements using limited maintenance funds and innovative solutions, the scope of deferred maintenance and the need for modern learning spaces has outpaced what our operating budget can cover.

    That’s why a bond referendum is needed now. It’s the only funding mechanism available to Minnesota school districts to address major facility needs. By investing in our schools through this plan, we can preserve our shared assets, protect learning time, and ensure our students and community have access to safe, secure, and future-ready spaces for decades to come.

  • The bond will generate $36.5 million in construction investment, creating 200–250 jobs and producing more than $58 million in local economic activity. New facilities will attract tournaments, competitions, performances, and events, bringing 8,700+ visitors each year and adding over $6.5 million in local spending over the next ten years.

    • $36.5M construction → $58M total activity

    • 200–250 jobs created

    • $6.5M visitor spending in the next decade

    Strong schools draw new families and businesses, expanding the tax base without raising rates for current residents. Research shows every $1 spent on schools can raise home values by $20, benefiting all property owners.

    • Attracts residents & employers

    • Expands tax base

    • Raises property values

    The bond also invests in career-ready programs like woods, welding, culinary arts, and nursing, preparing students for local jobs and supporting workforce needs.

    • Expands vocational programs

    • Prepares students for careers locally

    • Strengthens local employer partnerships

  • Yes. The district works with specialized legal counsel to ensure every aspect of the referendum process complies with state and federal laws. Our bond counsel, Kutak Rock LLP, is a nationally recognized law firm with deep expertise in public finance. They provide legal guidance on ballot language, bond issuance, and all required legal filings, ensuring our process is accurate, transparent, and legally sound.

    Kutak Rock has represented school districts, cities, counties, and other public entities across the country. We are especially proud that one of our representatives on the Kutak Rock team is a Cambridge-Isanti Bluejacket graduate, bringing both professional expertise and a personal connection to our community. Their role is to protect the district—and ultimately taxpayers—throughout the entire process.

  • The district is required by law to follow a strict, competitive bidding process for all construction projects. This process is designed to ensure fairness, transparency, and the best value for taxpayers.

    Here’s how it works:

    1. Detailed project specifications are developed with our architects and engineers so every bidder is pricing the same scope of work.

    2. Public bid advertisements are posted so qualified contractors can submit proposals.

    3. Sealed bids are opened at a public meeting on a specific date and time to ensure complete transparency.

    4. Review and verification are conducted to confirm each bid meets the project requirements, licensing, and bonding standards.

    5. The district awards the contract to the lowest responsible bidder—meaning the contractor who not only offers the lowest price but also meets all quality, safety, and performance criteria.

    Just as some community members pride themselves on scrutinizing bids and negotiating savings, the district does the same—leveraging the expertise of our architects, construction managers, and finance team to identify cost efficiencies and avoid unnecessary expenses. This approach has helped us complete past projects on time, within budget, and in some cases, under budget, returning unused funds to taxpayers.

Tax Impact & Cost

  • Ehlers, Inc. is one of the Midwest’s most respected independent public financial advisory firms, with more than 65 years of experience serving school districts, cities, counties, utilities, and other government entities. They are not a bank, lender, or underwriter—meaning their advice is impartial and focused solely on the public’s best interest.

    Our district has partnered with Ehlers for many years. They know our community, our financial history, and our long-term goals, which allows them to provide advice that is both highly accurate and tailored to our needs. Their expertise extends beyond schools, having guided hundreds of public entities across Minnesota and neighboring states through successful facility, infrastructure, and capital improvement projects.

    For our district, Ehlers:

    • Analyzes finances, debt schedules, and tax impacts to develop the most cost-effective plans.

    • Structures and manages the competitive sale of bonds to secure the lowest possible interest rates.

    • Ensures all financing complies with state and federal requirements.

    • Provides clear, transparent financial information for our community.

    As an independent municipal advisor, Ehlers has a legal duty to act only in our community’s best interest. Their long-standing relationship with our district and decades of public-sector experience make them a trusted partner in helping us invest wisely for the future.

  • If approved, the bond referendum would result in the following estimated monthly tax impacts for a home valued at $300,000:

    • Question 1 is approximately a $5/month increase

    • Question 2 is approximately a $11/month increase (and requires passage of Q1) 

    • Both Questions: combined are approximately a $16/month increase

    This investment takes advantage of expiring debt to reduce the overall impact on local taxpayers while allowing for significant improvements districtwide.

    To calculate the impact for your property, click here.

  • Minnesota’s School Building Bond Agricultural Credit (AG2School Credit) provides landowners tax relief on school bonds by providing a 70% reduction for their agricultural property. It was created to help reduce and equalize taxes for agricultural landowners in districts where, historically, it was difficult to pass bonds because of how agricultural landowners were taxed. 

    Since the bill was passed, rural districts have been able to pass bonds that improve the quality of Greater Minnesota Education.

  • No, they are not inaccurate. The numbers we share in our presentations, charts, and online tax calculator come directly from Ehlers Public Finance Advisors, an independent and highly respected municipal financial firm that works with school districts and local governments across Minnesota. These calculations use the most current data available from the county assessor’s office and follow the state’s standard tax impact formula.

    It’s important to note:

    • Every example is an estimate based on today’s property values and interest rates. Your individual tax bill may vary slightly based on future changes in property valuation, interest rates, or other factors outside the district’s control.

    • The same transparent tax impact chart and calculator have been shared openly at Community Task Force meetings, local official briefings, the Chamber of Commerce, and dozens of other public presentations.

    • Anyone can see exactly how the numbers are calculated—there is no hidden formula or “special math.”

    We are committed to full transparency and want residents to have the clearest possible picture of what the referendum would mean for all. That’s why we’ve made the full calculations, background data, and tax calculator available at C-ISchools.ReferendumFacts.org/the-investment.

  • No. That number is inaccurate and misleading. The actual tax impact for the average homeowner in our district is about $192 per year—that’s $16 per month, or roughly $0.53 per day.

    The $18,000 figure being circulated takes the total cost of the entire referendum project and divides it by the number of households, which is not how school bonds are financed or how taxes are calculated. School bonds are paid over time, and the tax impact is spread across all property types—not just homes—including businesses, agricultural land, and seasonal/recreational properties.

    For accurate tax information and a personalized calculator, visit C-ISchools.ReferendumFacts.org/the-investment.

  • We’re taking Advantage of Expiring Debt. That allows us to add $87.1M with only a $5/month increase. Without that expiring debt, the cost of Question 1 would have been much higher.

    Question 1 uses up all the savings from expiring debt, which keeps the cost low. Question 2 comes with the full cost of new debt, which is why it’s more expensive.

  • We use $300,000 because school taxes are based on a property’s assessed value, not its market value. In Isanti County, assessed values typically trail market values by about 85–90% in any given year. $300,000 is roughly 88% of the average market value referenced from a search of Zillow and falls within the historical range.

    For anyone who wants to know the exact impact on their own property, we provide a tax calculator at: The Investment — C-I Schools Referendum Facts.

  • We agree—our community deserves clear, accurate information about the cost of the referendum. That is why we work with Ehlers, Inc., an independent public financial advisory firm with decades of experience and a long history with our district, to calculate tax impacts using official, publicly available property valuation data. These calculations are based on assessed property values, not fluctuating market prices, to ensure accuracy and consistency for all taxpayers.

    Our numbers are not “sales pitch” estimates—they are the official, verified figures used in every public presentation, FAQ, and our referendum tax calculator. We provide these tools so every property owner can see their individualized cost based on their specific assessed value.

    Our district has a strong track record of transparency and fiscal responsibility. We have completed past projects on time and within budget, and we are committed to the same accountability in this process. We understand that many in our community are facing financial pressures, and our goal is to provide the facts—openly and honestly—so voters can make an informed decision that is right for them.

  • While our community is incredibly generous, the cost of constructing a Fieldhouse—estimated at $36.5 million—is far beyond what could reasonably be raised through donations or sponsorships alone. Even large-scale fundraising efforts in communities our size typically generate only a fraction of the amount needed for a project of this scope.

    That said, fundraising and sponsorships can still play an important role in enhancing the facility once it’s built. We are already working on partnerships and opportunities to involve local businesses in meaningful, visible ways—including potential naming rights, advertising, and community programming collaborations. These efforts could help offset operational costs, add amenities, or expand access for community members.

    The reason the Fieldhouse is part of the referendum is because public facilities of this size and purpose require a stable, long-term funding source that can only be secured through voter-approved bonds. This ensures the building is designed, constructed, and maintained to the standards required for decades of safe, community use.

    It’s also important to note that, as outlined in our FAQ on the positive economic impact of school investments, a Fieldhouse would not only serve students—it would draw visitors for tournaments, events, and activities, generating new revenue for local businesses and strengthening our community’s economy.

The Needs

  • Like most Minnesota school districts, our District faces a significant amount of deferred maintenance, and we are committed to addressing these needs strategically. The district has made progress addressing critical infrastructure needs – all without increasing taxes – however our budget does not cover all of the needs in our District. 

    Many of our facilities require significant updates due to their age. Their wear is evident, highlighting the need for improvement. At the same time, we have an opportunity to reimagine both the appearance and functionality of our buildings to meet modern learning needs.

  • We are committed to our mission to educate, empower, and inspire every student, every day. As part of our strategic priority to modernize learning spaces, we recognize that where students learn matters. Modern learning environments look and function differently than traditional classrooms—offering flexible, student-centered spaces that support collaboration, creativity, and real-world learning.

    Instead of fixed rows of desks, modern classrooms feature adaptable layouts, breakout areas for small group work, integrated technology, natural light, and furnishings that encourage movement and engagement. These spaces are designed to support a wide range of teaching approaches and learning styles—helping every Bluejacket feel connected, challenged, and ready to thrive.

    Investing in these environments is not about aesthetics; it’s about giving our students and educators the tools and settings they need to succeed. Whether it’s project-based learning, career-focused labs in areas like robotics or healthcare, or collaborative problem-solving exercises, modern learning spaces help prepare Bluejackets for the future. Just like a lab equips a scientist to do their best work, a modern classroom empowers Bluejackets to reach their full potential.

    Click here for examples of modern learning environments.

  • The district has made significant progress in improving our facilities and addressing critical infrastructure needs through innovative solutions. Similar to classroom funding, the financial resources allocated to facility maintenance are often insufficient to cover all deferred maintenance requirements. Our district's buildings vary widely in age, with some as new as five years old and others nearing a century.

    In 2022, we implemented a strategic and creative plan to invest $18 million in critical infrastructure improvements, energy efficiency upgrades, and other essential projects—all without increasing taxes. This initiative has allowed us to preserve and enhance our oldest buildings while ensuring a safe and modern learning environment for students and staff.

    Our facilities are built on solid foundations, but many require significant updates due to their age. Their wear is evident, highlighting the need for improvement. At the same time, we have a valuable opportunity to reimagine both the appearance and functionality of our buildings, transforming them to meet the needs of a modern learning environment.

  • School district facilities are community assets, but like most Minnesota school districts, our district faces a significant amount of deferred maintenance, and we are committed to addressing these needs strategically. A portion of the required work can be funded through our Long-Term Facilities Maintenance (LTFM) funds, which provide essential support for facility upkeep. However, the total maintenance needs exceed the available funding.

    For this reason, this will be part of the comprehensive facility plan the Task Force will develop over the coming months. Our objective is to systematically address the most pressing maintenance concerns while working toward a sustainable future where LTFM funds are sufficient to maintain our facilities for years to come.

  • Several key facilities needs have been identified to support our growing and dynamic community and fall into the following categories: 

    • Deferred Maintenance: Address overdue maintenance to ensure our facilities are safe and functional. 

    • Safety and Security: Enhance safety measures to provide a secure learning environment for all students and staff. 

    • Capacity: Expand our facilities to accommodate increasing student enrollment and community growth. 

    • Modernization and Innovative Learning Spaces: Create learning environments that support programming demands and foster creativity and innovation. 

    • Recreation, Athletics, and Activities: Improve and expand spaces for sports, recreation, and extracurricular activities to support student well-being and engagement. 

    These needs reflect our commitment to providing a high-quality educational experience for every member of our community. 

  • While Question 2 is not intended to replace a traditional, standalone community center, it does respond to several long-identified community needs. Specifically, it includes the development of a Community Fieldhouse—a versatile indoor facility designed for shared use by both schools and the broader community.

    The proposed Fieldhouse would feature a walking/running track, fitness areas, locker rooms, and public meeting space. It would be available for community use, offering new opportunities for wellness, recreation, and connection—especially during Minnesota’s long winter months.

    Importantly, the amenities included in the Fieldhouse reflect the top-rated features identified in a recent regional study conducted by Visible Cities. This study explored community priorities for a potential community center, and the proposed features—such as indoor walking space and flexible recreation areas—ranked among the highest for local residents.

    The Community Fieldhouse represents a strong step forward in meeting local needs by expanding access to high-quality, multi-use space that supports student activities, healthy lifestyles, and community connection for residents of all ages.

  • We've grouped these items into broader categories—like safety/security improvements, mechanical upgrades, classroom renovations, and site work—so the community can clearly see the priorities and how the work aligns with the needs of our schools. That’s why we engaged a nearly 60-member Community Task Force—made up of parents, staff, students, business owners, and local residents—to review the facility assessments, cost estimates, and priorities in depth. This group carefully examined the detailed line-item lists, asked questions, debated options, and ultimately developed the recommendations now before voters.

    We understand that some have questioned our transparency. In reality, we have discussed these details openly in public meetings, community presentations, and task force sessions. Anyone who would like to review the full list of line items is welcome to make an appointment—we are happy to accommodate and walk through every detail.

    Our goal is to keep the community informed while making the information clear, accessible, and focused on the improvements that matter most for safety, learning, and community use.

  • The new pathways are not optional - they are required under the Americans with Disabilities Act to ensure full accessibility for individuals with limited mobility and other physical needs.

    If you’ve attended sporting events at our high school over the years, you know that our current pathways are not sufficient. Uneven surfaces, steep grades, and limited accessible routes make it difficult for many to get to the stands, restrooms, and other facilities.

    These improvements are about more than compliance—they ensure that all community members can attend school events, regardless of age or disability. Safer, more accessible pathways mean grandparents, parents with strollers, veterans, and individuals with mobility challenges can participate fully in our school and community life.

  • This line item is part of our deferred maintenance plan to upgrade building automation systems—specifically the heating, cooling, and ventilation controls in our schools. The “graphics” in this context are not decorative; they are the interface our maintenance staff uses to monitor and adjust HVAC systems across the district.

    Upgrading this technology improves indoor air quality for students and staff by allowing more precise control of temperature, airflow, and filtration. It also makes our HVAC systems far more efficient—helping reduce utility bills by an estimated 20–40% through smarter scheduling, occupancy sensing, and system optimization.

    This is a practical investment in health, comfort, and cost savings—not an unnecessary expense.

  • These items are not “luxuries”—they are end-of-life equipment that now require replacement for safety, compliance, and reliability:

    • Athletic field lights – Installed in the 1970s, these lights are at the end of their life. They produce poor visibility, draw frequent public criticism, and pose safety risks. Last year, one fixture caught fire during a soccer game. They are also one failure away from going completely dark during events. Replacing them ensures safe, reliable lighting for students, athletes, and community use.

    • Performing Arts Center (PAC) curtains – The curtains are at the end of their life and must be replaced to meet current fire safety codes, as required by the Fire Marshal. The PAC is a valued community asset used for school performances, local productions, concerts, and events, yet it has not seen significant upgrades in over 20 years.

    • Wireless microphones – Current microphones are outdated, unreliable, and at the end of their life. They are essential tools for instruction, performances, presentations, and community events held in the PAC and other venues.

    These replacements address safety, compliance, and accessibility while protecting important community spaces that serve thousands of students and residents each year.

  • This walkway is actually a catwalk over the media center, a central hub of learning in the school. In recent years, it has posed a serious fall risk for students, and several safety incidents have occurred. Adding a fully enclosed glass barrier will eliminate this risk while preserving the only source of natural light in the space.

    If we used solid sheetrock instead of glass, the media center would lose all natural light—significantly changing the atmosphere and learning experience for students. The glass solution keeps the area bright, welcoming, and safe.

    It’s also worth noting that this improvement represents less than one penny per month for the average household as part of the referendum, yet it delivers a meaningful safety upgrade for students.

  • While our district has done a commendable job maintaining facilities and addressing critical infrastructure needs, the reality is that aging systems eventually reach the end of their useful life. Mechanical systems, roofing, interiors, and exteriors now require replacement—not just repair. This is not a reflection of neglect, but of natural lifecycle expiration. Updating our aging buildings now avoids more expensive emergency repairs or replacements later. 

    Moreover, educational needs have evolved. Our current learning environments lack the flexibility, technology, and specialized spaces that are now standard in modern education. These limitations impact our ability to deliver high-quality instruction and offer the same educational experiences as other districts in our area.

  • Expanding and strengthening Career & Technical Education (CTE)—also known as vocational programming—is a major priority in this referendum. Our community has made it clear—they want more opportunities for students to graduate with real-world skills, industry certifications, and pathways to high-demand careers. This plan directly invests in making that happen across trades, technology, healthcare, and other emerging fields.

    The referendum would:

    • Renovate and expand CTE/vocational classrooms and labs for trades such as manufacturing, construction, welding, automotive technology, agriculture, and culinary arts.

    • Upgrade equipment and technology to meet current industry standards, preparing students for immediate employment or advanced technical training.

    • Create flexible learning spaces to support emerging programs in healthcare, IT, and other high-demand fields.

    • Improve safety and functionality in hands-on learning areas, ensuring modern, well-equipped environments.

    For example, the proposed culinary arts lab is not a luxury—it’s a career-preparation space where students gain hands-on experience in food science, nutrition, hospitality, and business skills. Just like agriculture is evolving with drones and precision technology, every industry is changing rapidly. We must prepare students for a future we can’t fully imagine yet, with facilities that mirror the real-world environments they’ll encounter.

    These investments build on the success of our current programs, which have already saved families millions in tuition through industry certifications and college credit opportunities. By expanding CTE/vocational capacity, we strengthen our local workforce, support area businesses, and give our students the competitive edge they deserve in a rapidly changing world.

  • No. From the very beginning, this proposal has addressed a broad set of needs identified through years of stakeholder and community input, facility assessments, and planning—not just deferred maintenance. While replacing aging systems and addressing deferred maintenance is one important part of the plan, the full package also includes:

    • Safety and security improvements

    • Modernizing learning spaces and technology upgrades

    • Capacity solutions to address enrollment pressures

    • Enhancing community-accessible recreational, athletic, and activity spaces

    These priorities came directly from the work of a nearly 60-member Community Task Force, which included parents, staff, students, business owners, civic leaders, and residents. The Task Force reviewed district facility assessments, staff and community surveys, and professional studies before recommending a plan that balanced maintenance needs with improvements to support learning, safety, and community use.

    At no point was this referendum “sold” as only a deferred maintenance proposal—our communications, presentations, and website have consistently reflected the full scope of the plan.

  • Restroom updates in the referendum are about privacy, safety, and ADA accessibility for everyone, not about adding dozens of new facilities. Many of our restrooms are original to the buildings, making them outdated, difficult to maintain, and not up to current building codes or accessibility standards.

    The updated designs focus on modern, single-user restrooms in certain locations. These provide greater privacy for all students and visitors—similar to what you now see in restaurants, coffee shops, airports, and shopping malls. This approach reduces wait times, improves safety and cleanliness, and makes restrooms more welcoming for everyone, including those with disabilities, health needs, or young children.

    These upgrades also address practical issues:

    • Replacing aging plumbing fixtures to reduce maintenance costs and water usage.

    • Ensuring ADA compliance so facilities are accessible to all.

    • Updating ventilation, lighting, and finishes to meet current health and safety standards.

    This is about common-sense improvements that bring our facilities up to the same standard you’d expect in other public places, while ensuring privacy and respect for every individual who uses them.

  • The referendum includes ($1.7 million) to install artificial turf at our stadium—a practical, long-term solution that improves safety, increases access, and reduces ongoing costs.

    Natural grass fields in Minnesota are often unplayable for much of the year due to rain, snow, and thaw cycles. This leads to frequent cancellations, uneven playing surfaces, and higher injury risk for students and athletes. Turf addresses these challenges by providing:

    • Consistent, safer playing conditions for physical education classes, athletics, and community activities.

    • Extended seasonal use, from early spring through late fall.

    • Cost efficiency over time—reducing expenses for watering, mowing, fertilizing, lining, and re-sodding, while eliminating the need to rest or rotate fields.

    • Increased community value by hosting youth sports, marching band, and public events without damaging the surface.

    With turf at the stadium, we can provide many more opportunities for students, including physical education, adapted physical education, baseball, softball, track, soccer, football, and marching band. It will also open the door for local club teams, youth sports, and community events throughout the year.

    Just like the proposed Fieldhouse, the turf will also have a positive economic impact—allowing us to schedule and host more tournaments, competitions, and community events that bring visitors to local restaurants, hotels, and businesses. Over the life of the turf, the savings in maintenance and the increased use of the facility help offset the initial cost, making it a more responsible choice than continually repairing and maintaining overused grass fields.

    Today, a majority of schools, colleges, and professional organizations have already moved in this direction. Cambridge-Isanti remains the only school district of our size in Minnesota without turf—continuing to face the limitations and higher costs of natural grass. This investment is about safety, opportunity, and long-term value for both our students and our community.

The Investment

  • This comprehensive plan would enhance the safety, security, and accessibility of our buildings. It would also improve learning environments for our students, as well as sports, recreational, and activity spaces for our community – providing improved learning spaces at all of our schools so we can continue to educate, empower, and inspire every student every day.

  • Without new bonds, the school tax—about $34/month on a $300,000 home—would decrease gradually through 2040 as existing debt is paid off. There would be no immediate drop in taxes. This referendum is the community’s plan, developed through years of input from residents, parents and students, business owners, civic leaders, and a nearly 60-member Community Task Force to avoid more costly problems in the future.

    Choosing not to invest now means facing higher costs from inflation (about $6 million per year in lost project value), emergency repairs that pull resources from teachers and classrooms, outdated and inefficient buildings, and missed grant or partnership opportunities. Minnesota provides only $1 per square foot for facility upkeep—well below the $4 recommended—so local bonds are the only way to maintain safe, functional schools.

    This proposal continues the current debt level the community is accustomed to, with a modest $16/month increase (if both questions pass), and time for the new debt to “wrap around” retiring debt so tax impact stays stable. We have presented this financing approach openly in public meetings, task force sessions, and online at C-ISchools.ReferendumFacts.org.

  • We are committed to our mission to educate, empower, and inspire every student, every day. As part of our strategic priority to modernize learning spaces, we recognize that where students learn matters. Modern learning environments look and function differently than traditional classrooms—offering flexible, student-centered spaces that support collaboration, creativity, and real-world learning.

    Instead of fixed rows of desks, modern classrooms feature adaptable layouts, breakout areas for small group work, integrated technology, natural light, and furnishings that encourage movement and engagement. These spaces are designed to support a wide range of teaching approaches and learning styles—helping every Bluejacket feel connected, challenged, and ready to thrive.

    Investing in these environments is not about aesthetics; it’s about giving our students and educators the tools and settings they need to succeed. Whether it’s project-based learning, career-focused labs in areas like robotics or healthcare, or collaborative problem-solving exercises, modern learning spaces help prepare Bluejackets for the future. Just like a lab equips a scientist to do their best work, a modern classroom empowers Bluejackets to reach their full potential.

  • No—none of the funds from the 2021 operating levy were used for building improvements. Operating levies are strictly limited by law and can only be used for day-to-day school operations. In our case, the 2021 Levy for Learning was specifically approved by voters to help hire and retain quality teachers and expand career and vocational education opportunities for students.

    Thanks to that support, we’ve strengthened our instructional programs and improved our financial stability. However, those dollars cannot be used for facility repairs, upgrades, or construction.

    At the same time, many of our school buildings are aging—some approaching 100 years old—and require significant updates to remain safe, efficient, and functional for today’s learning needs. While we’ve made strategic improvements using limited maintenance funds and innovative solutions, the scope of deferred maintenance and the need for modern learning spaces has outpaced what our operating budget can cover.

    That’s why a bond referendum is needed now. It’s the only funding mechanism available to Minnesota school districts to address major facility needs. By investing in our schools through this plan, we can preserve our shared assets, protect learning time, and ensure our students and community have access to safe, secure, and future-ready spaces for decades to come.

  • No. The $5 per month figure is accurate for the average residential homestead value in our district for Question 1 only and is based on certified tax impact data from Ehlers, our independent municipal financial advisor.

    A recent comment about $25/month calculation is flawed and incorrect for several reasons:

    • It divides the total project cost by the number of households. Property taxes are not calculated this way. Minnesota uses a property tax formula based on each property’s taxable market value and classification, meaning the cost is not the same for every home.

    • Businesses, seasonal/recreational properties, agricultural land, and higher-value homes pay more than the median household, which lowers the cost for many residential properties.

    • The $5/month figure is for Question 1 only. If both Question 1 and Question 2 pass, the total median residential homestead tax impact is about $16/month.

    • All of our estimates are based on the official tax base, valuation data, and state formulas—not a simple division of total cost by number of homes.

    We encourage everyone to use the Ehler’s Tax Impact Calculator at c-ischools.referendumfacts.org/the-investment to calculate your personalized impact based on your current property.

  • Yes. Investments in safe, well-maintained, and modern learning environments directly impact student achievement. Updated classrooms and specialized spaces allow for more effective instruction, hands-on learning, and access to technology and resources that prepare students for today’s world. Improved ventilation, lighting, and room design also support focus, reduce distractions, and promote physical well-being—all of which are proven to enhance learning in reading, writing, math, and beyond.

    In short, this referendum is about more than buildings—it’s about creating the conditions where every student can learn and succeed.

  • Yes. Updating and modernizing our school facilities is a responsible, forward-looking investment in our community’s future. High-quality schools are a cornerstone of vibrant communities—they attract new families, stabilize neighborhoods, and help protect property values. When school buildings are well-designed and well-maintained, they reflect a community that values education, growth, and quality of life.

    Modern spaces also ensure that public dollars are being used efficiently. Flexible, updated environments reduce long-term maintenance costs and can adapt to changing needs over time. These updates make our schools more functional and more appealing, supporting the broader goal of making our community a place where people want to live, work, and raise a family.

    Investing in schools is investing in the strength and stability of the community—and it’s one of the best ways to ensure that taxpayer dollars have lasting impact.

Community Involvement

  • Since 2019, Cambridge-Isanti Schools’ Administration and School Board—working closely with our community—have taken thoughtful and intentional steps to stabilize district finances and shape a long-term vision for our schools. That vision was built through years of engagement and input from a wide range of stakeholders, ensuring the final plan is rooted in community priorities and focused on student success.

    Key contributors to this process included:

    • Strategic Planning & Facility Task Forces: Two distinct community-based groups—one focused on long-term vision and another on facility needs—brought together over 120 members including families, students, staff, local business owners, and civic leaders. These task forces evaluated data, identified priorities, and formally recommended the plan to the School Board.

    • District Leadership: Conducted in-depth reviews of building conditions, enrollment trends, academic programming, and budget capacity to support a practical and responsible solution.

    • Professional Consultants: The District partnered with an experienced preK–12 facilities planning firm to assess infrastructure needs and help develop a comprehensive plan tailored to our community.

    • Staff & Community Feedback: Surveys and listening sessions gathered valuable insights from hundreds of staff members and residents, helping to shape and refine potential solutions.

    • School Board: After reviewing all data, feedback, and recommendations, the School Board unanimously voted to move forward with a bond referendum.

    This multi-year, inclusive process has led to a well-informed, community-developed plan that preserves and enhances our shared investments, supports modern teaching and learning, and provides safe, secure, and accessible schools for every Bluejacket.

  • We invited the entire community to apply to join the task force, ensuring a broad representation of all demographics. The task force includes students, staff, board members, business owners, parents, and other community members to capture the values, priorities, and spirit of our community.

  • Our schools are owned by our communities. The facility task force has been formed to ensure the community plays a significant role in deciding which projects are right for our district. Additionally, a community survey will gather opinions from a broad cross section of residents. All of this input will be brought back to the School Board for the final decision.

  • The District is committed to open communication and transparency in our facility planning process. To keep our community informed and engaged, we have launched the Facility Planning Website. This site serves as a central hub for updates at every stage of the process, including the facility study, community survey results, Facility Task Force meetings and presentations, FAQs, a planning timeline, and opportunities for involvement.

    We invite you to explore the website and stay informed as we work together to shape the future of our schools!

  • The Facility Task Force is actively engaged in assessing district needs and exploring potential solutions. All ideas and concepts will be carefully reviewed and prioritized based on task force input, community survey data, professional recommendations, and community feedback. To ensure transparency, summaries of task force meetings will be posted on the facility planning website, allowing the community to stay informed and engaged throughout the process.